Jon Bisset

Diversity at the CBAA and in our sector

jbisset, 10th February 2016
Print

The CBAA is committed to ensuring we have a diverse workforce and an inclusive and respectful environment.

Our approach to diversity encompasses the cross-section of people that make up our membership and the wider community we serve and includes ethnicity and cultural background, gender, age, sexual orientation, physical abilities, family status, religious beliefs, perspective and experience. It also refers to diverse ways of thinking and working.

In 2016, we have adopted new diversity policy, which sets this commitment out in detail and gives us something against which to measure our progress.

For the CBAA, diversity underpins our desire to improve our team performance and work to our full potential to achieve our strategic goals and maximise value for our members. Diversity is important because it helps provide for broader perspectives in relation to decision-making and a greater insight into the demographics of the community in which the organisation operates.

One of the targets that we’ve set, for example, relates to gender diversity. This says that 50% (give or take 10%) of the staff team and those in leadership roles should be women. Currently, following the implementation of our gender diversity voting system, 54% of leadership roles are filled by women and 45% of the staff team are female.

There is still work to do across our sector in this area and a strategy and targets are being set by the CBAA as a matter of priority. I encourage all stations to consider diversity and adopting a diversity policy, if you haven’t already. If you’re not quite sure where to start, please don’t hesitate to get in touch. We’re here to provide you with information and advice, and will be developing resources specifically to support stations in the area of diversity. I look forward to sharing more on this with you soon.

Jon Bisset is the CBAA's Chief Executive Officer.

Facebook comments

Related

Article

“Exposure” and “experience” are common media euphemisms (lately all too oft expressed) for “we won’t pay”, but just because they have no price attached doesn’t mean they have no value.

Article

Updates on submission to the Federal Budget process, political responses to the Music and Arts Economy in NSW report and support for community radio, and CBAA submission to the ACCC - and more.

Article

Abstract
Griffith University researchers in 2002 presented the final results of a national survey of community radio stations. The final report ‘Culture Commitment Community – The Australian Community Radio Sector’ contained a wealth of information on the sector and covered many ‘station–based’ perspectives on issues such as localism, funding and sponsorship, Indigenous and ethnic programming and training. A key criticism of this report was the lack of data on community radio audiences. Two years later, an expanded research team received funding from the Australian Research Council along with financial and in-kind support from Department of Communication, Information Technology and the Arts (DCITA), the Community Broadcasting Foundation (CBF) and the Community Broadcasting Association of Australia (CBAA) to investigate community radio and television audiences. This project is the first comprehensive qualitative audience study of the community media sector in Australia and responds to a need within the sector, from policy bodies and the broader Australian community, to better understand community broadcasters and their diverse audiences. Internationally, this project, in both scale and approach, is unprecedented. Thus, it heralds an exciting and pioneering stage in community broadcasting research. This paper outlines the aims and objectives of the project and our methodology for accessing Australian community media audiences. A qualitative engagement with the diversity of audiences characteristic of the community media sector has demanded new ways of doing audience research. This paper discusses some of the methodological hurdles we have crossed in our attempts to negotiate the research terrain and we raise some of the questions associated with the qualitative method and assert its validity and portability as a tool for better understanding and knowing the nature and composition of community media audiences in Australia.